WASHINGTON (AP) – Strong Supreme Court rulings on guns and abortion sent an unmistakable message. Conservative judges have the power and are not afraid to use it to make transformative changes to the law, no more and no less than to deprive a woman of the right to abortion that had been maintained for almost 50 years.
No more half measures, they declared Friday in annulling Roe v. Wade and allowing states to ban abortion. And the day before, in ruling for the first time that Americans have the right to carry handguns in public for self-defense, they said the Constitution is clear.
“A restless, newly constituted court,” is how Judge Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three liberals on the nine-member tribunal, described her colleagues in early June.
The abortion case, in particular, was a repudiation of the more incremental approach favored by Chief Justice John Roberts.
The decisions in the highly successful cases on consecutive days were the last and perhaps the clearest manifestation of how the court has evolved over the past six years, the product of a historic accident and the Republican political brute force, from of an institution which leaned to the right, but which produced some notables. liberal wins, to one with an aggressive, conservative 6-3 majority.
They also showed the enormous influence exerted by two unconditional right-wingers, Judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Thomas wrote the court’s opinion on guns, while Alito wrote for most abortions.
Alito’s opinion was unequivocal.
“Roe and Casey must be overturned,” he wrote referring to the court’s historic abortion precedents of 1973 and 1992, “and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives “.
Alone among the court’s six conservatives, only Roberts said he would take a “measured course,” simply maintaining the ban on abortions in Mississippi after 15 weeks. He said canceling Roe was an “unnecessary shock” to the legal system.
But the justice chief was unable to attract any support from his right-wing colleagues, including the three judges appointed by former President Donald Trump.
Judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett helped form the majority to overturn Roe and fulfill a prophecy of then-candidate Trump that his higher court elections would vote like this.
They were selected after a careful selection by Trump’s White House and conservative interest groups that was designed to avoid the disappointment of previous GOP candidates such as Judges David Souter and Anthony Kennedy, the votes of the which helped preserve Roe 30 years ago.
But how did Trump come to have three vacancies to fill? Following the death of Judge Antonin Scalia in February 2016, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky vowed to prevent President Barack Obama from occupying the seat during the election year.
Obama appointed Merrick Garland, then a federal appellate court judge and now President Joe Biden’s attorney general, but Republicans didn’t even give Garland a hearing.
When Trump surprisingly won the presidency, he appointed Gorsuch, which was only confirmed after McConnell ruled out what was left of the Senate obstruction for high court candidates.
Judge Anthony Kennedy retired the following year and Kavanaugh obtained confirmation shortly after facing charges, which he denied, sexually assaulting a woman when they were teenagers decades ago.
The death of Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020 led to quick confirmation of Barrett by Republicans, despite the approaching election and McConnell’s opposition during Obama’s term to fill an opening in a year electoral. He took his seat a few days before the 2020 elections and consolidated conservative control in court.
Without the votes, the three-court liberal minority of the court could only look on in dismay, limited to writing dissents that were alternately scathing and sad.
In his dissent on the gun case, Judge Stephen Breyer accused his colleagues in the majority of acting “without considering the potentially deadly consequences” of his decision, which came after a series recent mass shootings and while Congress was working to pass gun control. legislation signed by Biden on Saturday.
In the abortion decision, Breyer, Sotomayor and Judge Elena Kagan issued an unusual joint dissent, speaking as one.
“With pity, for this Court, but even more so, for the many millions of American women who today have lost fundamental constitutional protection, we disagree,” they wrote.
The dissent included a warning that “no one should trust that this majority has finished its work.” The judges suggested that the logic of the decision also jeopardized the previously recognized rights to same-sex marriage and contraception.
Alito refuted this suggestion, writing that “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to call into question precedents that do not relate to abortion.” But in a separate opinion, Thomas asked the court to reconsider its main privacy decisions, including its 2015 opinion guaranteeing the right to same-sex marriage.
The next term promises more of the same: affirmative action and voting rights are already on the agenda and a major electoral case could be added to the mix.
According to opinion polls, public approval of the court is already at a low level, and judges have repeatedly ruled over the past year in defense of its legitimacy.
Roberts has been the main voice in urging the public not to see the court not as another political branch of government, once he became entangled with Trump for judicial independence.
Years ago, Scalia sometimes opposed the smaller steps that Roberts often prefers. But at the time, there was no Conservative majority without the court president.
Judge William Brennan, a liberal who served for five decades, used to tell his secretaries that with five votes, anything is possible in the Supreme Court.
Conservatives have a surplus vote.
___
For full AP coverage of the Supreme Court ruling on abortion, go to