Two asylum seekers who were to be deported on a flight to Rwanda tonight have postponed their departure from the UK following the latest legal appeals.
A Boeing 767-300 is ready on the Ministry of Defense runway at Boscombe Down in Amesbury to take the first migrants to the East African country later tonight.
But the European Court of Human Rights has granted an urgent interim measure blocking the expulsion of an Iraqi detainee who was to be deported.
The court told the UK government that the applicant should not be transferred to Rwanda until three weeks after the final internal decision was taken in its ongoing judicial review process.
Johnson hints that UK could withdraw from European Convention on Human Rights – Live Politics News
The Interior Ministry also confirmed in writing that another Iraqi detainee, who is also due to be deported this evening, will not be on the plane following a Supreme Court injunction its exit.
It is understood that the European Court is considering a number of additional requests and will publish any other decision where possible.
Learn more about Migrant Crossings
Sky News understands that the government may try to counter appeals this evening before the plane leaves for Rwanda.
The challenges of four asylum seekers who were supposed to be on the plane were rejected earlier.
A fifth man lost an offer to appeal to the Supreme Court after a group of three judges denied him permission to challenge the Court of Appeal’s decision that the flight to Rwanda could continue.
This rejected an appeal by two refugee charities and the Public and Commercial Services Union.
Giving brief reasons for the decision, the court president, Lord Reed, said there was a “guarantee” that if the government’s policy of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda was considered illegal, it would be they would take steps to return the migrants transported. in the East African nation during the interim.
Stop Deportations protesters have taken direct action to resist the first deportation flight, closing with metal pipes and blocking the exits of the Colnbrook Immigration Removal Center at Heathrow, where it is believed that there were other people than the Ministry of the Interior intended to put on the flight to Rwanda. retained.
“This policy is the result of years of portraying migrants as less than human beings; it makes it possible for the Ministry of the Interior to inflict pain on them and get away with it. We, the citizens, refuse to accept it. the cruel, inhuman and inhumane acts of the Interior Ministry. illegal plans, “said a Stop Deportations activist.
Use the Chrome browser to get a more accessible video player
3:52 Rwanda: What is the government’s scheme?
The Prime Minister pledges to “continue” Rwandan politics
The plan to send people to Rwanda has been challenged in court and condemned by the great bishops of the Church of England as “an immoral policy”.
But Prime Minister Boris Johnson has maintained that the aim of the policy is to “support safe and legal routes for people to come to the UK and oppose illegal and dangerous routes”.
The prime minister told reporters on Tuesday that the program “may take a while to run properly, but that doesn’t mean we won’t continue.”
Asked if it would be necessary to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights in order to restrict legal challenges, Mr. Johnson added: “Will we need to change some laws to help us as we move forward? Maybe so and all that. The options are constantly being reviewed.”
It was previously understood that seven asylum seekers would be on the first flight from the UK to the East African country.
The number of people to board now is unclear.
The four potential deportees who today lost the Court’s bids to avoid being boarded include:
• an Iraqi Kurd who had suffered from PTSD in Turkey while traveling to the United Kingdom and had filed a complaint requesting that he not be withdrawn because of his mental health and his relationship with his sister, who lives in the United Kingdom. a Vietnamese man who claims to have received death threats from usurers in Vietnam, who was also denied after the judge rejected the argument that he was denied translation services • a man who traveled to the United Kingdom from Iran with his 21-year-old son and had asked the court to prevent his deportation because of his mental health and the right to a family life • a request from a Kurdish man who was also he denied her permission to appeal.
Use the Chrome browser to get a more accessible video player
2:41 Rwanda: PM willing to change the law
A legal challenge by the High Court and the Court of Appeal filed by groups such as Care4Calais on the first flight under the Rwandan scheme failed with reports placing the cost of the flight at £ 500,000.
The government has rejected this figure, but the cost of the deportation is believed to be in the hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Read more: What is it like to be a refugee in Rwanda? Why are migrants sent to Rwanda and how will it work?
Downing Street said the current approach already cost the UK taxpayer £ 1.5 billion each year, with almost £ 5 million a day lodged by asylum seekers in hotels.
Use the Chrome browser to get a more accessible video player
0:45 “Living in Rwanda is not a punishment”
In Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, Sky News asked the country’s government how it felt when deportees said they would rather die than be sent there.
Spokeswoman Yolande Makolo said: “We do not consider living in Rwanda to be a punishment.”
Last year, more than 28,000 people crossed the Canal in small boats, more than three times the number observed in 2020.
More than half were Iranians or Iraqis, with people from Eritrea and Syria also crossing, according to the Interior Ministry.