In her 70 years on the throne, the queen has been served by 14 prime ministers and 22 chancellors of the Treasury. He has seen the country become richer and healthier despite the five major recessions. In 1952, the economy was dominated by coal-fired manufacturing. Seven decades later, the wells have closed and Britain is primarily a service sector economy.
The last 15 years have been the hardest in the queen’s reign. Two deep recessions have provided support for an extremely weak growth period and flattened living standards. Inflation is the highest in four decades and the immediate outlook for the economy is poor.
That said, many things have changed for the better since 1952. People live longer, work fewer hours, travel more, and enjoy the benefits of 70 years of technological advancement in everything from improved medical treatment to cell phones. Only the wealthy had televisions, washing machines, and refrigerators in the early 1950s.
One thing that has not changed is the search for the magic ingredient to energize the economy or, to be more precise, to return the clock to its former glory under another monarch who reigned for a long time. Queen Victoria.
There has been a lot of experimentation. When Queen Elizabeth II ascended the throne in early 1952, the post-war Labor government had just lost power and had been replaced by the Conservatives, led by Sir Winston Churchill. There was, however, no major setback in the Labor nationalization program and it was so difficult to differentiate the economic policies of the new chancellor (Rab Butler) from those of the former chancellor (Hugh Gaitskell) that the centrist approach was given. to know. like butskellism.
In many ways, the 1950s were a good decade in which the money queues of the 1930s were replaced by full employment, relatively low inflation, and an increase in the purchasing power of consumers. The problem was that if Britain was doing well, other countries were doing better, in some cases much better. In the late 1950s, envious glances were cast across the Canal at much higher growth rates in West Germany, France, and the Netherlands.
And so began the search for miraculous healing. The 1960s saw indicative French-style planning and a national back and forth plan. In the early 1970s it was hoped that accession (which was then) to the European Economic Community could do the trick. At the end of that decade, Margaret Thatcher’s response to British economic turmoil was a dose of monetarist shock treatment: control of the money supply and moderation of public spending to reduce inflation.
Following this, the United Kingdom joined the European exchange rate mechanism in 1990 only to abandon it two years later. Tony Blair gave the Bank of England the freedom to set interest rates in 1997. , and David Cameron said austerity was needed to repair the damage caused by the 2007-08 financial crisis. Brexit and Boris Johnson’s level agenda are simply the latest in a long line of alleged panacea.
Some provisional conclusions can be drawn from this turn of initiatives. The pivotal period for the economy of the last 70 years was the long 1970s, which began in 1969 with the aborted legislation of Harold Wilson In Place of Strife to reduce the power of the unions and ended with the defeat of the miners. in 1985. t only that the power of organized labor was destroyed; it was that finance supplanted manufacturing as the engine of the economy.
Few chancellors since 1952 have changed the economic narrative so much, and even not always in a useful way. Some, like Denis Healey and Alistair Darling, never had time for much more than crisis management. And there have been many crises to deal with: the threat of the United States to extinguish the pound sterling over Suez in 1956; the 1967 devaluation; the arrival of the International Monetary Fund in 1976; Black Wednesday; the near collapse of banks in 2008; the global pandemic of the last two years.
The most successful chancellors have been lucky enough to get the job as the economy has recovered. That was true for Nigel Lawson, who replaced Sir Geoffrey Howe after Thatcher’s first turbulent term, and Ken Clarke, who followed Norman Lamont after he became the boy on Black Wednesday’s fall. The next decade and a half was the longest period of uninterrupted growth since the Industrial Revolution.
Sign up for the Daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk
Britain tends to move quickly from a sense of national sadness to a premature belief that the country has finally “cracked” it. The years leading up to the financial crisis were an example of this, when speculation in the city and the real estate market could not be curbed. Another was in the late 1980s, when a sharp recovery from the recession in the early 1990s was allowed to spiral out of control.
Getting the right balance, setting interest rates at the right level and having a competitive pound is of course important, but so is doing the little things right. Over the years, too little attention has been paid to the supply side of the economy, in part because the long terms of policy operation are uncomfortably adapted to the demands of the election cycle for immediate results.
The message of other economies – more successful – is clear and has been clear for the last 70 years. Identify the structural weaknesses of the economy, which in the case of the UK include overinvestment in home ownership and low investment in almost everything else. Implement appropriate policies to address issues. Then follow the course.