Asylum seekers arriving in the UK on “unnecessary and dangerous routes” could be electronically tagged under the new proposals from the Home Office.
A 12-month pilot plan has been launched to determine whether this is an effective way to “improve and keep in touch” with claimants.
The documents also suggest that the government wants to get data on how often asylum seekers flee.
Activists have called the measures “draconian”, which could affect refugees crossing the Canal.
It comes days after the European Court of Human Rights issued a precautionary measure that stopped the deportation of asylum seekers from the United Kingdom to Rwanda.
An Interior Ministry spokesman said: “The government will not be deterred while we plan the next flight to Rwanda.
“We will keep as many people detained as the law allows, but when a court orders that a person who is to be on Tuesday’s flight be released, we will label them when appropriate.”
Priti Patel described the landing of this first flight as an “absolutely outrageous” measure.
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, the interior minister promised to “find ways to overturn” the decision.
She said: “It could be argued that we have been a soft touch, and I think we have been frankly, in part because of our EU membership.
“You have to look at the motivation. How and why did they make that decision? Was it for political reasons? I think it is, absolutely.
“The opaque manner of this court is absolutely outrageous. That must be questioned.
“We don’t know who the judges are, we don’t know who the court is, we haven’t actually had a trial, just a press release and a letter saying we can’t move that person under Rule 39.
“They have not used this ruling before, which calls into question the motivation and lack of transparency.”
What is the ECHR?
The European Court of Human Rights is a Council of Europe court and has nothing to do with the European Union.
It ensures that council member states, such as the United Kingdom, respect the rights and guarantees set out in the European Convention on Human Rights.
The flight came to a halt after an ECHR intervention brought new challenges to the courts in the United Kingdom.
It was understood that the ECHR had granted an urgent interim measure blocking the deportation of an Iraqi detainee.
This ruling allowed the lawyers of the other six people who were to be on the flight to file successful last-minute applications.
Read more: What is the European Court of Human Rights?
The Daily Telegraph claimed that Ms Patel’s allegations that the ECHR was “opaque” indicated her desire to leave its jurisdiction.
English judges of the Court of Appeal had ruled on Monday that the flight could continue after a legal challenge by activists, who said the government’s plan to send some migrants to the East African country was bury.
Ministers have defended the policy, saying it is necessary to stop the illegal trafficking of people in small boats across the Canal.
The ECHR ruling called for some Conservative MPs to remove the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights, on which the court ruled.
Use the Chrome browser to get a more accessible video player
5:28 Patel accused of “trick” of Rwanda
Justice Secretary Dominic Raab has suggested that the UK stay within the convention, but new laws could ensure that the Strasbourg court’s interim measures can be ignored by the government.
The grounding of the flight came after a series of legal challenges in the High Court, the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the ECHR on behalf of the asylum seekers who had to be sent on the outward journey to Rwanda.
The Prime Minister has repeatedly attacked those who have filed legal challenges, accusing them of “encouraging” criminal gangs.
Lawyers, meanwhile, have received death threats.
The United Kingdom has continued to be a signatory to the ECHR, which upholds human rights obligations under international treaties, such as the Good Friday Agreement and the Brexit agreement.