The pandemic brought about significant changes in the Australian federation, especially in empowering states, albeit without any formal alteration in the distribution of responsibilities. We have yet to see if lasting changes will emerge from this experience. But if the Albanian government wants to promote its various reforms, the maximum possible harmony with the states, and especially with the larger states, will be vital.
Perrottet, meanwhile, who is facing very difficult elections early next year, has an incentive to move forward with a new popular federal government. He doesn’t want fights on two fronts.
Whenever possible, the prime minister will take his stated goal of a “consensus” approach to his dealings with states, which could be all Labor on the continent if Perrottet loses. Albanese wants a “reset” on the federation.
Education Minister Jason Clare is already pursuing a “re-establishment” and a consensus approach to higher education, which set out its plans at a conference of Australian Universities this week.
Political actors and commentators have noted a sentiment among many people after the election of what is described as “relief”. Nowhere is this more evident than in the university sector.
The Coalition barely tried to disguise its hostility towards universities. He decided they were rich enough not to need JobKeeper, so they were excluded from that assistance. Some had many resources, but not all. And the pandemic hit the body in the lucrative income stream of foreign students. There have been big job cuts.
Loading
The old government also had ideological problems with universities. They were seen as incubators of left-wing ideas. I wanted them tied much more directly to the job market. He reshaped his funding, imposing higher fees on humanities students.
Clare will announce in the coming months a group to lead the process of “agreement” proposed by the work to chart future directions for universities. This will involve a wide range of stakeholders and involves important new research on the sector.
Tanya Plibersek, who was expected to hold the education portfolio, summed up Labor’s desired approach when she was shadow minister. “The aim of an agreement would be to reach a consensus on key political issues and national priorities in a sober and evidence-based way, without so many cuts and political impulses. The construction of this consensus should help maintain university reform “.
But Andrew Norton, a professor of higher education policy at the National University of Australia, says the word “agreement” implies “the implication that we will seek an agreement between conflicting opinions and interests rather than a new one.” coherent political direction based on rigorous analysis ”.
While the collaborative approach is welcome, possible points of tension are evident, especially when the government will have strong budgetary constraints over the coming years.
The next consensus test will be the September working summit. This will be a brainstorming exercise, but the government will also want to shape it as a prelude to the October budget, and that would require some common messages.
Loading
The summit must reach some agreement on the immediate problems, probably not so difficult given the acute shortage of the labor market. To what extent, however, will participants be able to come together around solutions, for example, the desired level of migration?
In a bold or reckless gesture, according to your point of view, Albanese has indicated that he will not be deterred by the lack of consensus in one of the most sensitive political areas he faces. This is the plan to hold a constitutional referendum this term to enshrine an Indigenous Voice in Parliament.
In a recent interview with The Australian, the Prime Minister said: “There is no need for a consensus, but for a broad agreement, firstly, between First Nations leaders and then, secondly, you would seek to reach such a political agreement. as wide a referendum as possible.
“That doesn’t mean any group would have veto power because my concern is that if there is no referendum in the foreseeable future, the momentum will be lost.” If the Coalition were to oppose it, “we consider it a factor but not necessarily decisive.”
Conventional wisdom is that, given the difficulties of delivering any referendum and the sad history of attempts, bipartisanship would be essential to its success. Speaking to Sky on Thursday, opposition spokesman Julian Leeser did not commit to the Coalition’s likely position.
The costs of failure in something so fundamental would be high. The defeat of the 1999 republican referendum left the issue off the agenda for a generation (so far).
It would be extremely risky for Albanians to go to the village without consensus among the main parties.
On the other hand, their threat to do so may increase pressure on the opposition. It would certainly intensify what will be a very difficult debate inside. Would the Coalition really want to retain its support and, in doing so, nurture division in the community?
It’s too early to tell. But we can say that this referendum is shaping up to be the most important social issue of this legislature.
The morning edition newsletter is our guide to the most important and interesting stories, analysis and knowledge of the day. Register here.