Boris Johnson lost the support of all his main defenders in the last months before his resignation, with the Brexiters and right-wing culture warriors encouraging him to victory the first to undo, followed by the ministers of the cabinet once loyal. But one group will mourn the end of the Johnson era: Green Conservatives have seen the prime minister as their best hope for years and are worried their successor will not live up to their promises.
Johnson’s position as prime minister has brought more important environmental legislation and, arguably, more progress in tackling climate and natural crises than any of its conservative predecessors of the past decade.
Three flagship acts of Parliament: the Agriculture Act, the Fisheries Act and the Environment Act, as well as a plan to achieve zero net emissions, an energy security strategy and the United Nations Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow last November, they were an energetic action. two and a half years. Johnson has also overseen plans to phase out petrol and diesel cars, a boom in offshore wind and a promise to protect a third of the UK’s land and seas.
Sam Hall of the Conservative Environment Network said green policies have always been central to Johnson, not a complement. “Despite the political turmoil caused by Brexit and the pressures to respond to the pandemic, the prime minister has presented an impressive amount of new environmental policies at the national level and has prioritized environmental issues in international forums such as the Cop26 and G7.
“Net zero in particular has been seen as an integral part of the government’s leveling strategy, with a large number of new investments aimed at flowing into UK industrial cores as a result of our net zero target. In response to Ukraine’s crisis, the Prime Minister has redoubled renewable energy to strengthen the UK’s energy security and alleviate the cost of living, although he has been unable to gain further support for the Treasury’s energy efficiency. ” .
Ben Goldsmith, a prominent supporter of the Green Conservatives and brother of Zac, the foreign minister raised by Johnson to the Lords, said: “I have not seen any prime minister before that he has given so much importance to climate and nature recovery. “It has been bigger than we have seen since any previous government.”
Goldsmith highlighted Johnson’s genuine interest in nature and animal welfare issues, shared by his wife Carrie Johnson. “He has a sense of the sacred,” Goldsmith said. “Nature is very important to him. I’m not sure many political leaders share it.”
Even fervent green activists give credit to Johnson. Dave Timms, head of political affairs for Friends of the Earth, said: “As Prime Minister, Johnson made the climate crisis increasingly part of his public and personal narrative of the Conservative Party. His rhetoric at times like the UN climate negotiations, although it was idiosyncratic, it did not avoid recognizing the level of catastrophe facing the world or the urgency of the necessary action. “
But activists also said Johnson’s ecological achievements were fragile, flawed and undermined by twists and omissions. Along the way there have also been victories for the Tory party’s Net Zero Scrutiny right-wing group, set up to obstruct climate policies. And alongside announcements such as a “10-point plan” to “better rebuild” the pandemic, there have been political failures and gaps, as well as many measures: road construction, airport expansion, new oil licenses and North Sea gas. and a controversial new coal mine, which goes against Johnson’s ecological ambitions.
“It is a tragedy that seemed incapable of turning [his rhetoric] in decisive and coherent internal action across the government to address this crisis, “Timms said.” Key departments were able to act as if the climate crisis were an optional complement or, in the case of Rishi Sunak’s Treasury, to actively undermine it. efforts with tax exemptions for short-haul flights, cuts to isolation programs and a road construction boom. “
The unexpected tax on oil and gas companies is another example: the way it is being implemented means that it could, in a perverse way, increase the production of fossil fuels, as companies can escape the tax by investing in new oil and gas developments in the North Sea.
When it comes to nature protection, too, rhetoric has surpassed reality, according to Richard Benwell, executive director of the charity Wildlife and Countryside Link. “Johnson has made some excellent promises … But there is still a significant gap between promise and practical action,” he said.
Urgent investment was needed, in water quality and habitat restoration, and to improve UK farmland, but all of it was “unfinished, unenforced and unfunded,” Benwell said. , and some proposals “would weaken our most important nature conservation laws.”
These failures will be what counts, Timms added. “The cost, in economic and social terms, of not acting [on the environment] it will completely eclipse the money spent now to move us into a zero carbon future. Measures such as comprehensive home insulation programs will save money on fuel bills, investing in green energy will free us from the tyranny of volatile fossil fuel prices. Hundreds of thousands of new and long-term jobs can be created, but the longer we leave the action, the more expensive and harmful the final bill will be. “
Johnson’s inability to maintain control of his party has opened up an even greater danger: the possibility that his successor may abandon his green inclination to appease the conservative right. Their scandals have already given way for some who were always dissatisfied with environmental policies to express their grievances.
The Net Zero Scrutiny Group of about 20 Conservative MPs has suggested that the net zero should be pushed back as it is too expensive, and that more investment in fossil fuels is needed to combat rising energy prices. Hall described the Net Zero Scrutiny Group as a “noisy minority within the party,” while the Conservative Environment Network has more than 100 deputies as members. Its impact, however, means that the aspiring green prime minister leaves a confusing legacy and environmentalist-minded conservatives must fight to save as much as they can from the remnants of politics.
His claims have little basis in fact: the UK energy price crisis is due to the excessive dependence on gas fueled by the lack of investment in renewable energy and energy efficiency, and to seek greater dependence on gas only stores problems for the future. But anti-green rhetoric has gained strength in the right-wing press and seems to be influencing Johnson’s possible successors: Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss have been very interesting on ecological issues.
Sign up for First Edition, our free daily newsletter, every weekday morning at 7:00 BST
Joshua Marks, of the BrightBlue think tank, which advocates green policies from a conservative standpoint, warned that Johnson’s failures would mark the UK for years to come. “Johnson considered himself a green tsar whose enduring legacy is the decarbonisation and leveling of Britain through a transition to a low-carbon economy. With distractions like the coronavirus, I suspect he will not be remembered as such,” he said. to say.