COVID causes “experimental vaccines” that could cause unknown side effects, say former employees
A group of former Quesnel City Council employees who lost their jobs for refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 are taking the municipality to court.
In a civil lawsuit, the nine plaintiffs allege that they oppose undergoing an “unwanted medical procedure” that “involves the injection of experimental vaccines that are ineffective in preventing infection and transmission and that pose serious risks, up to and all risk of death included “. ; and revokes its right to exercise its right to informed consent in matters of medical risk-taking. “
According to the claim, the city’s municipal administrator, Byron Johnson, issued a policy on November 5, 2021 that required all employees, volunteers and contractors to show proof that they were fully vaccinated on January 3, 2022 and those who if they didn’t they would have four weeks of unpaid leave.
Those who still refused and did not receive accommodation under the Human Rights Code within this time period, in turn, will be dismissed and probably would not have the requirements for employment insurance benefits, Johnson warned.
The nine were placed on unpaid leave on January 10, 2022, and on February 7, 2022, they were all fired from their jobs with only one right to IS benefits until May 2022.
They continue to question the need to get vaccines, saying the risk of serious illness and death from the disease depends entirely on a person’s age, sex and health status and that, according to the BC Center for Disease Control , the average age of death for or with COVID-19 in the province is 82 years.
“Wide segments of society have an extremely low risk, with healthy young and middle-aged people with a statistical risk of zero death,” they say in the complaint.
Instead, they questioned the efficacy and safety of vaccines, saying Health Canada has not subjected them to the same strict scientific approval process as previous vaccines and drugs.
“Because of their childhood, these new therapies could cause unknown – and unrecognizable – side effects right now. No one can be sure about the long-term effects of a vaccine that hasn’t existed in the long term and hasn’t existed. it has been studied for a period of years, ”they say.
They go on to say that mRNA injections “cause terrible side effects that are often worse than coronavirus infection, especially for young, healthy receptors.”
Before executing the warrant, they say the City Council refused to meet with its union to develop an adjustment plan and noted a Labor Relations Board decision in which the arbitrator punished an employer for not “engaging in a cooperative consultation process” before implementing a mandatory vaccination policy.
Each of the plaintiffs is seeking compensation for damages of up to $ 2 million, half for alleged violation of their rights under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations, the Penal Code, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the other half for punitive and exemplary. damages and aggravated damages due to mental discomfort.
They also demand several statements, including one that, according to the Workers ’Compensation Act, the City Council“ created an unsafe work environment by obtaining experimental products linked to serious adverse events such as myocarditis, seizures heart failure and death, which can endanger the lives of their employees. “
The lawsuit was filed in the BC Supreme Court in Prince George on June 22. None of the allegations have yet been proven in the courts and the defendants, which include the provincial government, as well as the City Council and the municipal administrator, have not yet filed responses to the complaint.