NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled 6-3 that New York regulations that made it difficult to obtain a license to carry a concealed pistol were unconstitutionally restrictive and that it should be easier to obtain such a license.
The existing standard required that an applicant show a “proper cause” for seeking a license and allowed New York City officials to exercise discretion in determining whether a person has shown a good enough reason to have a weapon. of fire. It was not enough to say that one wanted to protect oneself or one’s property.
“In this case, the petitioners and respondents agree that ordinary, law-abiding citizens have a similar right to carry guns publicly for their own defense. We also agree, and now hold, agree with Heller and McDonald’s, that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect a person’s right to carry a gun to defend themselves away from home, ”Judge Clarence Thomas wrote in the Court’s opinion. “Because New York State issues public transportation licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the state’s licensing regime violates the Constitution.”
The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. against Bruen, was the first major arms rights case before the Supreme Court in more than a decade.
During the oral arguments it seemed likely that the conservative judges of the court would rule against the state.
“Why isn’t it good enough to say that I live in a violent area and that I want to defend myself?” Judge Brett Kavanaugh asked.
SUPREME COURT SIGNS THAT COULD EMBODY OR LIMIT NY ARMS PERMIT RESTRICTIVE LAW
In an exchange with Judge Samuel Alito, New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood acknowledged that if an applicant stated that the permit worked late at night and he had to walk from a subway station through a neighborhood high crime to get home, this person would be denied. because they did not cite any specific threat.
HORSFORD, GOTTHEIMER VULNERABLE DEMOCRATS EXPLAIN VOTES AGAINST BIPARTIS SUPREME COURT SECURITY BILL
“How consistent is this with the basic right to self-defense?” Alito asked, stating that this is the core of the Second Amendment.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Conservatives said it would be reasonable to have limits on where a hidden firearm could be carried.
This is a developing story. Please check back for more details.