Among Australia’s gas-producing giants. Will they be our reluctant saviors?
In a sense, these companies have been forced to solve the supply crisis created by coal energy deficits. And industry experts say there is enough gas to achieve that result. Australia is a major producer of gas but exports most of it abroad.
Proponents of forcing large producers to divert enough gas for domestic use are at odds with producers, who can sell gas on the international market in cash at exorbitant prices.
Big gas companies say breaking contracts with international customers would give Australia a bad reputation – a sovereign risk. It seems a bit like they are talking about their own book and the biggest risk would be their high profits, facilitated in large part by the scarcity resulting from the Russian war in Ukraine.
That said, the solution to sending gas to the southern states is too simplistic. There needs to be enough pipe capacity to deal with the shortage, and industry experts say these pipes are already working at their capacity.
Loading
Another group of actors in this energy debacle are the big commercial consumers of energy: the companies that say the exorbitant prices they are paying now are sending them to the wall.
Most prudent users of large-scale industrial energy have previously signed long-term supply contracts, and will only have a price issue when those contracts occur. But there is a group of companies that have not covered their energy needs for the last two years and have recovered from energy costs by acquiring what they needed in the cheaper spot markets before.
This group is now shouting louder.
Understanding why energy costs are skyrocketing is complex, but finding a solution is even more so.
But what the crisis teaches us is that a relentless and uncoordinated transition to renewable energy is dangerous.
Instead, the shift to green energy should have been accompanied by the development of adequate infrastructure and appropriate price signals.
The transport of energy from where it is generated to where it is used takes place through a network that was developed for a nation using coal-fired power plants as its main source of energy.
The transmission network is centered around power plants, not the more fragmented sites that produce renewable energy. The current grid is not suitable for distributing energy, especially around a domestic market.
The resolution of this problem is what the chair of the Australian Energy Market Commission, Anna Collyer, is referring to when she talks about a $ 20 billion investment in the grid. This is a costly capital project that no government really wants to budget for, and it is not a short-term solution that will allow a political party to solve the cost of retail electricity bills today.
Loading
Meanwhile, the Albanian government does not want to advocate for any solution that seems to be backtracking on its credentials. Financial support to solve the problems of aging coal generators would be a difficult sale.
But the reality is that the supply of renewable energy is less reliable and must be complemented by a more reliable (dispatchable) statement generation: water pump, battery storage and some gas.
Head of Origin Frank Calabria argues that these reaffirming generation assets have not received the necessary investment because there is no payment for unused energy. He says a mechanism should be established by which these assets can yield even if they do not generate energy.
The momentum towards decarbonization will not change. The crisis could be just what is needed to focus on what needs to be managed when coal disappears as the country’s main source of energy.